Digital Photography- Six Lies

www.nobsphotosuccess.com
Tags: digital photography, Lies, Photography, Digital, nobsphotosuccess
Related posts:

www.nobsphotosuccess.com
Tags: digital photography, Lies, Photography, Digital, nobsphotosuccess
Related posts:
I love this video….great tips!
its not the size of the file its what you do with it?your a d -bag
He’s saying “it’s not the size of the file” with a dissolve into something I can’t read, because they shot this video on a cell phone camera. Live your own advice!
IF you need to post process and push/pull yeah, but their point is if you can get things out of camera as is, then there’s no such need. As for the 16/32 vs JPEG only 8- keep in mind JPEG is a non linear compression so the key aspects of the image go into the information… it’s more richer than it may seem.
Now if you are doing HDR or you need to push/pull a lot then yeah, but I think their point is, for their markets, they don’t need such thing *if* you get it right.
Good JPEG engines compress so little as to make virtually no difference. If you are getting the result out of camera and you have a decent JPEG engine that you can tweak to the “film of your taste” (which most current cameras do) then you are not losing much at all.
loved this video, now i might piss off alot of people but, you should do a “I’m a PC commercial”
Agreed there. Lighting… umm, flashes and strobes are technology. Those can get better, with technological changes. But, overall, a great video, with, like he said, valid points.
beautiful
Composition in my opinion is not IMMUNE to technological change. I may want to compose a scene in which parts of the scene will be totally washed out yet I will need detail in that part of my composition. And technology is what makes it possible from the days of graduated filters (which were made possible by technology) to today’s software replication of such filters. I believe you made that statement much too large as there are things that we can’t do without the assistance of technology.
Lots of good tips here, and some humor,
Now thats refreshing…More Please !
great video, friendly and not patronising an some great points that many entering into photography dont realise. however sometimes raw is much better if shooting in low light and trying to minimize noise.
great stuff guys
not to mention the deta loss in any photo editing. and that it auto sharpens creating noise, and the fact that RAW is 16/32bit colour while any JPEG is only 8bit?
i agree from experience that its allways best to get the white balence in camera though, and most of the rest of it..
Love it. Totally agree.
You have some good points but look at Loretta Lux. She couldn’t have existed 20 years ago. I think you underestimate the changes careful, intelligent use of the technology can bring.
Good stuff - I’ll pass this along to all my newsletter subscribers.
About the RAW vs. JPEG debate. You don’t mind the loss of image data because of JPEG compression? There may be some detail that you can never get back.
I love your “measure twice, cut once” attitude about photography!
I’m so glad to see someone going back to REAL photography. I took a digital photography class and my teacher actually said, “don’t worry about the picture because you can fix it later in photoshop.” Makes me sad :(
the best
I like your style!
Absolute truth! Love you guys!
Awesome video guys!